Sometimes the right next step is not an intervention.
Choose when to learn, experiment, revisit, act within approved evidence, or escalate. The five outcomes stay separate.
Regenerative agriculture needs more than a prediction. It needs to ask what we know, what we don’t, what matters to the grower, and what should happen next.
Distinct next-step pathways
Action, measure, experiment, wait, or abstainMapped capability functions
Interfaces mapped; many modules not builtExtensible crop context
Vineyard-first, not vineyard-onlyChoose when to learn, experiment, revisit, act within approved evidence, or escalate. The five outcomes stay separate.
Soils, crops, climate, evidence and methods change. The contracts remain visible while research modules can be added or withdrawn.
All demonstration cases and outcomes are fictional. No real farm datasets, field models, environmental outcomes or legal permissions are validated or connected. Nothing entered here is sent to a server. Farmers and qualified advisers retain all decisions.
Try a fictional decision episode, explore evidence states, and see which procedural pathway applies.
Each case is illustrative. No real crop effect is computed.
Changes here illustrate the decision grammar—not farm biology.
The fictional case needs a different observation type that could affect the subsequent choice.
The current hypothetical evidence record lacks an additional observation relevant to the action choice.
The displayed branch is downgraded to ABSTAIN / ESCALATE until the evidence and selected method are reassessed for the new conditions.
Unmeasured in demonstration
No validated effect evidence
Time, cost and return not established
Not assumed inferior to alternatives
Every conclusion should preserve the original observation, its limits, and when it became available for a decision.
Measurements, prior management, weather or literature are labelled with units, protocols and sources.
Crop and cultivar, soil, climate, observed date, decision-time availability, reuse rights and uncertainty are checked independently.
Competent manual practice is retained. Biological, predictive and causal models are separate optional components with their own limits.
A farmer or adviser controls action. New evidence can trigger rechecking without rewriting past observations.
Globally collected vineyard evidence is eligible for screening—not automatically fit for a German, Spanish or French field, or for another crop.
The RDE is bigger than any grant, vineyard example, model or algorithm. Modules can develop independently while the decision contract stays explicit.
What is known, observed, inferred or unverified, at what time and under which use rights?
Which next branch is justified under the preferences, limits and actual authority?
12 conceptual capabilities · Not 12 deployed services
DeepRAP, PtJ, GRAINSHIELD, FIERCE, EV and other projects may supply optional methods or lawful research evidence. None defines the parent RDE. The present executable Python baseline is a separate offline mechanical experiment; this public interface is a browser-only demonstration.