Research previewAbout this prototype ↗
OPEN, MODULAR, EVIDENCE-GOVERNED

Decisions that grow
with the living world.

Regenerative agriculture needs more than a prediction. It needs to ask what we know, what we don’t, what matters to the grower, and what should happen next.

◎01
5

Distinct next-step pathways

Action, measure, experiment, wait, or abstain
◈02
12

Mapped capability functions

Interfaces mapped; many modules not built
⌁03
∞

Extensible crop context

Vineyard-first, not vineyard-only
DECISION INTELLIGENCE

Sometimes the right next step is not an intervention.

Choose when to learn, experiment, revisit, act within approved evidence, or escalate. The five outcomes stay separate.

Try the workflow ↗
BUILT TO EVOLVE

Start with vineyards. Design for every crop.

Soils, crops, climate, evidence and methods change. The contracts remain visible while research modules can be added or withdrawn.

Explore the architecture ↗
This is an interactive research prototype, not a farming advisory service.

All demonstration cases and outcomes are fictional. No real farm datasets, field models, environmental outcomes or legal permissions are validated or connected. Nothing entered here is sent to a server. Farmers and qualified advisers retain all decisions.

RDE / DECISION WORKBENCH

Work through a decision.

Try a fictional decision episode, explore evidence states, and see which procedural pathway applies.

SYNTHETIC EPISODES ONLY
01

Choose a demonstration

Each case is illustrative. No real crop effect is computed.

Should a vineyard review its living-cover strategy before the next field operation?
02

Explore the evidence posture

Changes here illustrate the decision grammar—not farm biology.

What does the fictional evidence situation support?
ILLUSTRATIVE WORKFLOW RESULT01 / 05

MEASURE MORE NOW

The fictional case needs a different observation type that could affect the subsequent choice.

WHY THIS BRANCH?

The current hypothetical evidence record lacks an additional observation relevant to the action choice.

Return with new evidenceHuman decision authority

Consequences & trade-offs

No invented estimates
Short-term productionUNKNOWN

Unmeasured in demonstration

Long-term ecology / climateUNKNOWN

No validated effect evidence

Farm economicsUNKNOWN

Time, cost and return not established

Counterfactual / current practiceRETAINED

Not assumed inferior to alternatives

What the episode records

    Status: FICTIONAL / NOT AUTHORIZED FOR FIELD USE
    RDE / EVIDENCE LINEAGE

    Know where knowledge comes from.

    Every conclusion should preserve the original observation, its limits, and when it became available for a decision.

    01
    OBSERVATION

    A record enters the evidence boundary

    Measurements, prior management, weather or literature are labelled with units, protocols and sources.

    02
    CONTEXT & VALIDITY

    Where, when and for whom?

    Crop and cultivar, soil, climate, observed date, decision-time availability, reuse rights and uncertainty are checked independently.

    03
    METHOD / COMPARATOR

    Use the simplest adequate reasoning

    Competent manual practice is retained. Biological, predictive and causal models are separate optional components with their own limits.

    04
    DECISION & CORRECTION

    Keep the reasons open to revision

    A farmer or adviser controls action. New evidence can trigger rechecking without rewriting past observations.

    DEMO SOURCE RECORD

    Illustrative field observation

    Source class
    FICTIONAL
    Crop / country
    Grapevine · Germany
    Rights status
    DEMO ONLY
    Observed at
    Example time · stipulated
    Available at
    Example time · stipulated
    Scientific validity
    NOT ESTABLISHED
    Management effects
    UNKNOWN
    ↘

    Globally collected vineyard evidence is eligible for screening—not automatically fit for a German, Spanish or French field, or for another crop.

    RDE / EVOLVING ARCHITECTURE

    One core. Replaceable intelligence.

    The RDE is bigger than any grant, vineyard example, model or algorithm. Modules can develop independently while the decision contract stays explicit.

    NO FIXED MODEL STACK
    ARCHITECTURE A

    Evidence & evolving state

    What is known, observed, inferred or unverified, at what time and under which use rights?

    ARCHITECTURE B

    Decision & activation

    Which next branch is justified under the preferences, limits and actual authority?

    Capability registry

    12 conceptual capabilities · Not 12 deployed services

    Project independence, by design.

    DeepRAP, PtJ, GRAINSHIELD, FIERCE, EV and other projects may supply optional methods or lawful research evidence. None defines the parent RDE. The present executable Python baseline is a separate offline mechanical experiment; this public interface is a browser-only demonstration.